| Impeccable
is overrated, says Cambodian-American composer Chinary Ung. Off
The Edge interviews the veteran American-Cambodian composer in
Bangkok at the Thailand International Composition Festival 2008
IN
1940S CAMBODIA, a young boy found himself entranced by the sounds
of village folk music that echoed from the distance across the
paddy fields. At the time it must have been hard to imagine
that one day he would be at the forefront of the Asian contemporary
music scene in a faraway land.
Chinary Ungs journey to his current position as Professor
of Music at University of California, San Diego, has been a
long one and he is ready to admit that it has been fraught with
hardship. A realist at heart, he has no pretensions of fame
and little time for pomp. Despite winning the prestigious Grawemeyer
Prize for his piece Inner Voices in 1989, his music is imperfect.
His humility is infectious, and students at the Burapha University
in Bangsaen, just off from Bangkok, where the composer was the
guest of honour at the IV Thailand International Composition
Festival in July, crowded around him to solicit his advice.
GATHERING HIS THOUGHTS before his keynote lecture, we relax
in the cafeteria as he talks about how he made the trek from
Cambodia to America in his gentle, steady, almost lyrical voice.
I was born in Cambodia in 1942, at the edge of the village
surrounded by rice fields. My parents were very poor and unable
to support me, so they asked my grandparents to adopt me. There,
I grew up with folk music for example at night Id
hear drumming a few kilometres away [where some ritual was being
performed]. And we have a kind of gamelan orchestra which [folk]
performers would carry across the rice field on bamboo racks,
and play as they marched across. The first time I heard it,
I rushed to the backyard to watch. It was like music from heaven.
Ung played the ranad-ek, a traditional Cambodian xylophone,
and later studied the clarinet with a French teacher who was
responsible for exposing him to the first sounds of Western
classical music, at the time something relatively unknown in
Cambodia. When I first heard Beethovens symphony,
it was a revelation! he recalls.
Those were the years when the cancer of the Khmer Rouge was
slowly devouring the country. Ung narrowly escaped when he received
a scholarship from the Asia Foundation in 1964 to study in the
US. After his studies there, he met through a twist of fate
his future mentor Prof Chou Wen Chung, one of the leading voices
in Asian composition in the West.
I went to a concert of new music and heard a piece by
Chou Wen Chung called Cursive. And he was in the audience, so
I introduced myself to him. He said, Come to my school,
I just started teaching at Columbia. We talked it over
and I really wanted him to be my teacher, and eventually got
into Columbia.
AT THE TIME, Ung found modern Western music alien to his Asian
background. Studying in New York when 12-tone or serial
music was very prominent what they called up-town
music I was emotionally torn. I remember once I ran out
from my lessons into the street, and just leaned against the
lamp-post and cried, because it was a shock to hear all this
music that I had nothing to do with! He made up his mind
to master this new music. Although it was not Cambodian
music, I made myself sit in any concert regardless of what music
was playing. I disciplined myself by listening to every recording
I could get, one month would be Mozart month, then Mahler month,
then Debussy month
even while I was cooking I was constantly
listening to music. This was aside from my school assignments,
because I had to catch up! Ung recalls of his challenging
student years.
You know, one time the New York Quintet came to our Conservatory
to perform, he continues, relishing our rapt attention
as would a village storyteller. And after the concert,
they asked if we had any questions, so I raised my hand and
said, Yes sir. It looks like this composer by the name
of Mozart was very talented. They asked why and I replied,
Because he knows how to make scales go up and down and
make it sound good! And its true! Twenty years later
I remember that incident and think: thats not a bad answer!
he laughs heartily.
|
So what are we doing
now? Where are we heading? I call it a silent spiritual
crisis in musical composition among Asian composers.
The purpose of art older branches or art
is to strive for liberation.
|
AT THE NEW music festival in Thailand, Ung showcased a few
of his key works that bear a distinctly South East Asian flavour,
either through their fluid structures or from the constant presence
of modal harmonies and, in particular, vocal effects and singing
by the musicians. This form of raw vocalisation marks Ungs
current artistic direction, one that he feels draws him closer
to the spirit of his Cambodia roots.
Thats all I have been doing in the past decade,
asking players to vocalise, to sing. Its what Chou calls
a kind of South East Asian type of expression. The voice never
dominates the instrument; its always part of the texture.
As an example he describes his latest work, performed by his
wife Susan Ung at the concert at the Festival called Spiral
XI for solo viola, where the soloist also uses not just the
instrument but her voice as well. By this time, I have
had considerable experience; over ten years. When I first started
writing in this way, I thought it was one of those things that
youd do and then thats it, you move on to something
else. But now I am doing it as a direction. Its not just
about vocalisation, its a chemistry that you add to the
musical texture. Chou agrees with me on this. He even
advised me not to ask the instrumentalist to get voice training,
so he understands what I am looking for: pure, untrained voice
with no vibrato. That is what I want; it represents the voice
of the villagers. [In South East Asia] the traditional performers
and musicians are not trained; they are villagers who work in
the farm! Its no different from someone who works in a
bank or in a rice field in Bali, and in the evening they perform
the Ramayana!
That night, we experienced his vision as Susan Ung performed
on the viola, singing as a villager would as she went about
her chores, humming as a mother would to a child, chanting and
shouting as though in a village play or performing some ritual
earthy, primal, yet comforting in its familiarity.
DURING THE FESTIVAL, surrounded by hopeful Thai students, Ung
found himself constantly contemplating the challenges facing
Asian composers today. The issue thats been on my
mind for some years now is how Asia is going to head into the
future. We have the talent and we can work hard but the problem
I can see is that, on the one hand, a number of composers have
been following the European style too much. And on the other
hand you also have those who simply transcribe their native
music [into a western form]; they are not doing anything new.
They are in fact destroying it. So the question is what should
an Asian composer do?
And I dont want to be in the position to give the
answer, because there is no one answer. But during this Festival,
I began to realise that the answer is neither one of them. You
should swim in the middle. You have to go internally, spiritually,
to uncover or tap on the mother energy, and see what you can
do to go beyond yourself. And when you go beyond yourself,
you are part of the community, part of the collective consciousness.
I think thats what the answer is.
Art
not as an end in itself, but an expression of a community, as
it used to be in our past? Art itself is an illusion,
just like political power is an illusion. But nevertheless the
artist is one of the cleanest persons on the earth. Why? Because
as a good artist you have to have truth in you. If you keep
lying all the time, then you keep changing that damn chord all
the time!'
Silence, like the blank page, represents a sacred space.
It does not matter whatever religion you believe in, but you
have to respect that sacred space. When its sacred, you
know that you cannot abuse that space. At one point in your
music, you end up being an observer of sound that is moving
and in transition. And when you reach the point where you feel
your body is filled with sound then you know you dont
have to worry about composing anymore. The problem of composition
is over, and its then just a matter of time that you will
finish the piece.
Ung believes the act of composition is a spiritual search rather
than a deliberate act of creation. But that does not mean
that your piece is a masterpiece or that everyone will love
it. It has nothing to do with that. It has to do with a deeper
self-realisation, that any manifestation imperfection is a gift!
I mean, if we never die, something is wrong with us!
He laughs heartily. This is what is called balance. In
Cambodia, if you look at the floor plans of hundreds of temples,
you see that they dont build a perfect square. Of course
they know how to do it ... but for example Angkor Wat is a 1km
square, but they add six feet to one side on purpose.
Thousands of stone monuments and Buddhist temples in
Cambodia face the East, but only Angkor Wat, the most world
famous heritage site, faces West. Why? It drives Western scholars
crazy! They want answers, dammit! I have a PhD, why do
they frustrate me?
He laughs, imitating a bewildered Western scholar.
SO WHAT ARE we doing now? Where are we heading? I call
it a silent spiritual crisis in musical composition among Asian
composers. The purpose of art older branches or art
is to strive for liberation. If you are worshipping the
ism minimalism, serialism, or whatever, you
are dead. Or perhaps you are writing music for recognition,
or maybe for love. But love doesnt have to go that way,
you dont have to sell yourself. You have to strive for
liberation, spiritually, so you dont get trapped.'
You know, a number of the ideas in my music are not mine
at all; they have been in existence for a long time. It
reminds me of a quote I heard recently, that it is not the resulting
work of art that is important; its the process of creating
art that holds true meaning.
Exactly. If I have to label my art, my music is an imperfect
music, on two grounds: first, I cannot make it perfect, because
thats an illusion. Secondly, I literally, deliberately
make it imperfect. I distort it. Ultimately, we are all
impermanent. We are not God. We are nobody. We cannot even be
a master of ourselves, we can only be an observer, I think.
To be a master, that person must know the secret of being a
master. Forget it, I say. Baloney! You dont need to run
yourself down but lets be honest, you cant master
yourself.
UNG TALKS CANDIDLY about how he struggles with each new work,
and the months of searching and graft that it involves, and
questions the meaning of it all. I struggle and struggle,
and ten months later at one point I feel my body fill with sound
and then its over. So the question is, are you
composing for yourself or for your audience? Some say how can
you compose for all the people? Others say, I write music
for myself. But what is yourself? Do you think
that sound belongs to you? Or to your culture? Or from deep
down? Thats not 100 percent right either.'

In my past, I have been searching for my musical voice,
and I find that ones voice is a moving target, always
changing. Now I am not expressing my voice, maybe ... I dont
even care. Friends and family are more important, he says.
Productivity should not be the key. Overproduction can
really overtake your artistic direction. You have to be aware
of this. Be aware! Its very difficult [to be so aware].
Many people step all over other peoples feet to get somewhere.
Because its always a case of so little money or opportunity
for so many people to fight over? Yeah, but actually its
not relevant; they just dont see it that way. I teach
my students to think differently. That is not the only job if
you want to feed yourself. I have driven a taxi, I have been
a bus boy. Its something I had to do to earn money!'
One thing that the young generation has misunderstood,
as good as educational evaluation might be and I have
some reservations on that, straight As and so on
they never really test themselves spiritually or internally.
Ung talks about composers who write from formulas or textbooks
and who churn out works for mass consumption, and how they fail
to challenge themselves, draw on their spirit.
We see them all the time; artists who work for position and
power, who use art as a rung in the social and career ladder.
In Malaysia, artists like that are celebrated and put on pedestals,
and probably receive titles, I tell him. We laugh, and Ung tirelessly
continues contemplating all that is wrong with the world, and
how it is all mirrored in our little microcosm of composers
and musicians.
Along the way he drops plenty of his quirky little gems of
wisdom, one of which is rather timely: If Beethoven or
Mozart were around now, theyd get into technology and
into avant-garde music, and maybe even try the roller-coaster
or go to Las Vegas, because thats what life is! Its
not like in the hospital where everything is sterile and protected
from germs! I remember this quote very well: Pasteur at the
time of his death regretted that, All my life I tried
to extinguish all the bacteria and viruses ... I made a mistake.
I really like that
We should learn to coexist. You dont
have to make everyone follow your religion. You dont be
rich alone. You dont take it all. You share.
ff The Edge, Nov 08
Related Links
5 Apr 2010 |